Skip to content
TutorialsA Coaley Peak® site
ComparisonIndependent & UK-focused

ChatGPT vs Claude

ChatGPT (OpenAI) and Claude (Anthropic) are the two assistants most UK professionals reach for first. Both are very good, and getting better. So the question is rarely which one wins. It is which one fits the way you work. Below is how they compare on the things that change your working day, not the leaderboard scores.

At a glance

The contenders

ChatGPT

The broad, well-connected all-rounder.

Indicative price

Free tier; Plus around £20/month

Best for

Everyday tasks, image generation, voice, and a deep ecosystem of custom GPTs and integrations.

Watch out: The free tier uses smaller models, and the sheer number of features can feel busy when you just want to write.

Claude

The careful, long-form writing and reasoning specialist.

Indicative price

Free tier; Pro around £18/month

Best for

Long documents, nuanced drafting, code review, and tasks where you want a measured, low-hallucination tone.

Watch out: Fewer built-in extras (no native image generation), and availability can be tighter at peak times on the free tier.

Side by side

How they compare

Feature comparison for ChatGPT vs Claude
FeatureChatGPTClaude
Long-document handlingStrongExcellent
Writing tone & nuanceStrongExcellent
Coding helpExcellentExcellent
Image generationYesNo
Voice conversationsYesNo
Web browsing / current infoYesYes
Free tier worth usingYesYes

Pricing and capabilities change frequently; figures are indicative and in GBP. Always check the provider for the latest.

The verdict

So which should you choose?

Want one assistant that does a bit of everything (images, voice, plug-ins)? Start with ChatGPT. If most of your work is writing, editing, or reasoning over long documents, and you value a careful tone, start with Claude. Both have a free tier worth using, so the cheapest way to decide is to run the same real task through each for a week.

Keep reading

Reviews tell you what to pick; our free tutorials show you how to use it well.